Abstract

Parkinson's disease (PD) is associated with specific cognitive deficits in the absence of dementia, including the inability to suppress previously learned responses in a changed context. Our goal was to determine whether this set-shifting deficit is sufficient to account for impaired performance on a problem-solving task, or, instead, whether it is necessary to postulate deficits in one or more other cognitive capacities, such as logical deduction. Deductive reasoning and other conceptual abilities were assessed in 15 nondemented subjects with PD who had never been medicated, 15 nondemented subjects with PD who were currently receiving medication, and 15 healthy elderly control subjects. On a deductive reasoning task, Poisoned Food Problems, the PD groups made more errors than the control group. The PD groups' error pattern was characterized by intrusions of information from previous problems. By contrast, the PD groups made appropriate assessments of redundant and irrelevant information that appeared in these problems, and performed normally on other tests of concept formation and problem solving that did not require set shifting, indicating that the capacities for logical deduction and concept formation were intact. The set-shifting deficit, conceptualized as a difficulty in suppressing a prepotent response, appears to be a primary cognitive impairment in PD and presumably arises from dysfunction of the nigrostriatal-dorsolateral prefrontal cortex complex loop.