Abstract

It has been hypothesized that impaired task-switching underlies some of the behavioural deficits in schizophrenia. However, task-switching involves many cognitive operations. In this study our goal was to isolate the effects on latency and accuracy that can be attributed to specific task-switch processes, by studying the inter-trial effects in blocks of randomly mixed prosaccades and antisaccades. By varying the preparatory interval between an instructional cue and the target, we assessed the costs of both (1) an active reconfiguration process that was triggered by the cue, and (2) passive carry-over effects persisting from the prior trial. We tested 15 schizophrenic subjects and 14 matched controls. A very short preparatory interval increased error rates and saccadic latencies in both groups, but more so in schizophrenia, suggesting difficulty in rapidly activating saccadic goals. However, the contrast between repeated and switched trials showed that the costs of task switching in schizophrenia were not significantly different from the controls, at either short or long preparatory intervals, for both antisaccades and prosaccades. These results confirm prior observations that passive carry-over effects are normal in schizophrenia, and show that active reconfiguration is also normal in this disorder. Thus problems with executive control in schizophrenia may not affect specific task-switching operations.